Hagar v. Coup
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Anderson v. Ritterbusch (Okla. 1908)
- Goldberg v. Trustees of Elmwood Cemetery (Mich. 1937)
- Jenkins v. Oklahoma City (Okla. 1910)
- Auditor General v. Bishop (Mich. 1910)
- Edwards v. Cooper (Ind. 1907)
- Hull v. Hull (Mich. 1907)
- Farr v. City of Detroit (Mich. 1904)
- Erickson v. Cass County (N.D. 1903)
- Gates v. City of Grand Rapids (Mich. 1903)
- Nowlen v. City of Benton Harbor (Mich. 1903)
- Tuller v. City of Detroit (Mich. 1901)
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. (Minn. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
¥e are of opinion that under the Act of 1879 and the case of Bagley v. Pridgeon 42 Mich. 551, residence of at least one of the parties in the city of Detroit is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the Superior Court, and that the parties cannot confer jurisdiction where none is given by the statute. Any other view would enable parties, if so disposed, to submit to and bring into that court all classes of personal actions from any part of the State.-
If the appellees disputed the right of counsel to sue out
The judgment must be reversed with.costs of both courts.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.