Bacon v. Kennedy
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jackson Investment Corp. v. Pittsfield Products, Inc. (Mich. Ct. App. 1987)
- City of Cincinnati v. Fenner (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati 1901)
- Schaeffer v. Anne Arundel County (Md. 1995)
- Sullivan v. Faria (R.I. 1973)
- Cunningham v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1931)
- Hay v. Hudson (Wyo. 1924)
- Garry v. Martin (Mont. 1924)
- Cadman v. Smith (Okla. 1905)
- Auditor General v. Calkins (Mich. 1904)
- Munroe v. Winegar (Mich. 1901)
- Finlayson v. Peterson (N.D. 1896)
- O'Hara v. Parker (Or. 1895)
- Wilson v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. (8th Cir. 1894)
- Wesbrook Lane Realty Corp. v. Pokorny (Mich. 1930)
- Casey v. Goetzen (Mich. 1927)
- Fenner v. City of Cincinnati (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati 1901)
- State v. Cherry County (Neb. 1899)
- Gage v. Sanborn (Mich. 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The only question in this case is whether a statutory foreclosure is valid where the sale was made on a notice which, although published twelve times in separate weeks, provided for selling on a day less than twelve weeks from the first publication. The statute does not say that notice shall merely be published twelve times, once a week, but once a week “ for twelve successive weeks.” The object of this was manifestly to give that full interval between the first notice and the sale. Such was the basis of the decision in Gantz v. Toles 40 Mich. 725; and the same principle has been applied in other cases, some of which were referred to on the argument.
As the court below so held, the judgment was correct and must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.