Robison v. Recorders' Court Judge
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Brown v. Circuit Judge (Mich. 1895)
- Attorney General v. Superior Court Judge (Mich. 1894)
- Hart v. Circuit Judge (Mich. 1892)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
To compel respondent to proceed to the trial of certain indictments for bribery, found in the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, and quashed for want of jurisdiction.
Granted February 3, 1886.
Held, that while the Attorney General should represent the people in the Supreme Court, there is no rule of law preventing that court from considering an application by the prosecuting attorney of a county, to set a court in motion to proceed in a case under his control therein; that a decision quashing an indictment is reviewable, and mandamus is the more appropriate writ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.