Mosher v. Bay Circuit Judge
Mosher v. Bay Circuit Judge
Opinion of the Court
October 15, 1895, the First National Exchange Bank of Port Huron sued out a writ of attachment against relator from the Bay circuit court upon a debt not yet due to the amount of about $22,000, returnable November 5,' 1895. The sheriff of that county seized and took into his possession, among other property, a large quantity of lumber and shingles belonging to the relator, situate in the yard of relator at West Bay City, near the Michigan Central Railroad Company’s tracks
The parties have been heard, and we think the order must be set aside. The property attached is not perishable, within the meaning of the statute. It provides that—
“When any of the property taken in attachment shall consist of animals or perishable property, the court or any judge thereof ipay make an order directing such property to be sold, and the money arising from such sale to be brought into court to abide the order of such court. ”
There is no power vested in the circuit judge or circuit court to make an order for the sale of perishable property except the power conferred by statute, and we think this not perishable property, within the meaning of the statute.
The writ must be granted as prayed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.