Emerson v. Kinne
Emerson v. Kinne
110 Mich. 678; 68 N.W. 982; 1896 Mich. LEXIS 784
Emerson v. Kinne
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). We think the circuit court was in error. The defendant did not tender the amount due upon the contract. A creditor is under no obligation to receive less than the amount that is due. Coots v. McConnell, 39 Mich. 748; 25 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 910; Clark, Cont. 641.
The judgment must be reversed, and the court below directed to give the plaintiff his costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.