Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 36 (Mich. 1896)
Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge
Opinion of the Court
To vacate an order dismissing garnishment proceedings for want of prosecution, it appearing that three garnishee defendants were individually proceeded against and separately answered, and in the title of the motion to dismiss the three were joined as garnishee defendants, and the motion to vacate was based upon such joinder.
Order to show cause denied June 2, 1896. See St. Sav. Bk. vs. Ct. Judge, 95 M., 100, No. 39.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNION NATIONAL BANK v. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne)
- Status
- Published