Michigan Supreme Court, 1896

Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge

Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided June 2, 1896
1 McGrath 36

Union National Bank v. Circuit Judge

Opinion of the Court

To vacate an order dismissing garnishment proceedings for want of prosecution, it appearing that three garnishee defendants were individually proceeded against and separately answered, and in the title of the motion to dismiss the three were joined as garnishee defendants, and the motion to vacate was based upon such joinder.

Order to show cause denied June 2, 1896. See St. Sav. Bk. vs. Ct. Judge, 95 M., 100, No. 39.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.