The complainants filed a bill in chancery which avers that they are minors; that July 7, 1885, their father, Michael Tolan, died, leaving surviving him the complainants, a widow, and five children who at the time of the filing of the bill had attained their majority. The *679bill avers that Michael Tolan was the owner of the north 35 feet of lots 7 and 8, block 35, of the city of Escanaba, which was clear of all incumbi’ances, except $150, which has since been paid; that said Tolan owed no debts at his decease; that July 10, 1885, an instrument purporting to be the last will of Michael Tolan was offered for probate. A copy of the will is set out in the bill, from which it appears that all the property was willed to his wife. The bill avers that the will was probated, and a distribution of the property made according to its terms; that July 6, 1886, the estate “was wound up, and the executors duly discharged; ” that complainants were all very young, and did not know the meaning or effect of the instrument, and were not represented by a guardian ad I'item, or any one else. The bill avers that the instrument purporting to be the will of Michael Tolan was not his will, but was obtained by fraud and deceit. The bill avers that June 3, 1890, Mary Tolan, widow of Michael Tolan, “executed to J oseph Hess, of the city of Escanaba, Michigan, a certain real-estate mortgage, which said mortgage is recorded in Liber G of Mortgages, on page 329, in the office of the register of deeds for said Delta county, that, by virtue of the conditions of said mortgage, said Hess, on the 16th day of February, 1895, began proceedings to foreclose by advertising; that on the 13th day of May, 1895, because of said foreclosure proceedings, the said lands were sold to the highest bidder for the sum of $1,250, or thereabouts ; that said sale purports to be a sale of the entire premises; that the said Hess is the highest bidder aforesaid. ” The prayer is as follows:

“Forasmuch, therefore, as your orators are without remedy in the premises except in a court of equity, and to the end that the said Joseph Hess, who is made a party defendant to this bill, may be required to make full and direct answer to the same, but not under oath (answer under oath being hereby waived), and that the said mortgage may be set aside and declared to be null and void in so far as the interests of your orators are concerned, and that the sale aforesaid may be set aside in so *680far as your orators are concerned, and that all proceedings had or to be had by virtue of said mortgage be declared null and void in so far as the interests of your orators are concerned, and that the said J oseph Hess be restrained by an injunction, to be'issued out of and under the seal of this court, from in any way disposing of 01-incumbering the real estate hereinbefore described, or from proceeding in any way with the foreclosure proceedings hereinbefore referred to, in so far as your orators are concerned, during the pendency of this suit, and that your orators shall have such other and further relief in the premises as equity may require and to this court shall seem meet.”

The bill was demurred to, and the demurrer sustained. Complainants appeal.

It will not be necessary to consider all the questions discussed by the solicitors in their briefs. Neither the widow of Michael Tolan, nor any of the five children who have attained their majority, is made a party to the litigation. There is no averment in the bill of the value of' the estate left by Michael Tolan. There is no averment in the bill which contains a description of the land which was mortgaged to Mr. Hess, nor is it averred that it was land in which the complainants have any interest, or that they are in any way harmed by the mortgage foreclosure. There are other grave defects in the bill, which it is not necessary to point out here. The circuit judge very properly sustained the demurrer.

The decree is affirmed, with the costs of this court.