Clark v. Lowe

Michigan Supreme Court
Clark v. Lowe, 113 Mich. 352 (Mich. 1897)
71 N.W. 638; 1897 Mich. LEXIS 783
Grant, Other

Clark v. Lowe

Opinion of the Court

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The defendant contends that the agreement was set forth in the deed, and that this agreement cannot be varied by parol. We think the case is ruled by Bowker v. Johnson, 17 Mich. 42, and Ford v. Savage, 111 Mich. 144.

The judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
CLARK v. LOWE
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published