Clark v. Lowe
Clark v. Lowe
113 Mich. 352; 71 N.W. 638; 1897 Mich. LEXIS 783
Clark v. Lowe
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). The defendant contends that the agreement was set forth in the deed, and that this agreement cannot be varied by parol. We think the case is ruled by Bowker v. Johnson, 17 Mich. 42, and Ford v. Savage, 111 Mich. 144.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.