Michigan Supreme Court, 1897

Attorney General v. Common Council

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided June 7, 1897

113 Mich. 388; 71 N.W. 632

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Wexford Medical Group v. City of Cadillac (Mich. 2006)
Oakwood Hospital Corp. v. State Tax Commission (Mich. 1965)
Ladies Literary Club v. City of Grand Rapids (Mich. 1980)
American Concrete Institute v. State Tax Commission (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Consumers Public Power District v. City of Lincoln (Neb. 1959)
Temple Lodge No. 6, A.F. A.M. v. Tierney (N.M. 1933)
St. Joseph's Church v. City of Detroit (Mich. 1915)
Chelsea Health and Wellness Foundation v. Township of Scio (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
Saginaw Hebrew Benevolent Society v. Budd (Mich. 1952)
Auditor General v. R. B. Smith Memorial Hospital Ass'n (Mich. 1940)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Stoll (Mich. 1936)
People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Rockford Masonic Temple Building Ass'n (Ill. 1932)
Scottish Rite Building Co. v. Lancaster County (Neb. 1921)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The board of assessors of the city of Detroit assessed the property, real and personal, of the Masonic Temple Association, at the sum of #169,000, of the Harmonie Society at #47,700, of the Arbeiter Society at the sum of #13,340, and of the Detroit Telephone Company at the sum of #250,000. The common council, sitting as a board of review, held that the property of the Masonic Temple Association and that of the Harmonie Society were exempt from taxation under subdivision 4 of section 7, Act No. 206, Pub. Acts 1893, which reads as follows:

“Such real estate as shall be owned and occupied by library, benevolent, charitable, educational, and scientific institutions incorporated under the laws of this State, with the buildings and other property thereon, while occupied by them solely for the purposes for which they were incorporated: Provided, that such exemption shall not apply to fraternal or secret societies, but all charitable homes of such societies shall be exempt.”

They reduced the valuation of the property of the Arbeiter Society two-thirds, and of the Detroit Telephone Company to #25,000. The object of this suit is to determine the validity of this action of the council.

1. The property of the Detroit Telephone Company is by law exempt from local taxation. By the act of incorporation (section 8 of Act No. 129, Pub. Acts 1883; 3 How. Stat. § 3718Ti), telephone companies are made subject to taxation in accordance with Act No. 168, Pub. Acts 1881. By this act these companies are required to make a report annually to the auditor general, and the auditor general, state treasurer, and commissioner of the land office are constituted a board to determine the rate of tax to be levied, “which tax shall be in lieu of all other taxes, state and local, and ghall be payable to the state treasurer.” It follows that the action of the council in assessing this property for local taxation is void.

2. The' real ■ estate of the Harmonie Society is not exempt from taxation. 1 How. Stat. § 4471, especially *390provides that the real estate of such associations is subject to be taxed as other real estate.

3. The property of the Masonic Temple Association, the Harmonie Society, and the Arbeiter Society is not exempt from taxation. They do not come within subdivision 4 of section 7 of Act No. 206, above quoted. It is not enough, in order to exempt such associations from taxation, that one of the direct or indirect purposes or results is benevolence, charity, education, or the promotion of science. They must be organized chiefly, if not solely, for one or more of these objects.

The writ of mandamus will issue in accordance Avith this opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.