Gratopp v. Van Epps
Gratopp v. Van Epps
1 McGrath 765; 4 Daily L.N. 418
Gratopp v. Van Epps
Opinion of the Court
To compel respondent to issue.an execution upon a judgment recovered before his predecessor.
Respondent was elected to succeed one Salisbury, whose term expired July 4, 1895. The city re-incorporated under Act No. 215, Laws of 1895, and at the time of such re-incorporation there were four justices in said city, two of whom, not including respondent, were re-elected under Sec. 5 of Chap. 5 of said act.
Held, that a justice of the peace is a constitutional officer and the legislature cannot deprive him of the power and duties conferred upon him by that instrument.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.