Gratopp v. Van Epps

Michigan Supreme Court
Gratopp v. Van Epps, 1 McGrath 765 (Mich. 1897)
4 Daily L.N. 418

Gratopp v. Van Epps

Opinion of the Court

To compel respondent to issue.an execution upon a judgment recovered before his predecessor.

*769Granted July 13, 1897.

Respondent was elected to succeed one Salisbury, whose term expired July 4, 1895. The city re-incorporated under Act No. 215, Laws of 1895, and at the time of such re-incorporation there were four justices in said city, two of whom, not including respondent, were re-elected under Sec. 5 of Chap. 5 of said act.

Held, that a justice of the peace is a constitutional officer and the legislature cannot deprive him of the power and duties conferred upon him by that instrument.

Reference

Full Case Name
GRATOPP v. VAN EPPS (Justice of the Peace)
Status
Published