Michigan Supreme Court, 1899

Raymond v. White

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1899 · Grant, Other

120 Mich. 165; 78 N.W. 1071; 1899 Mich. LEXIS 898

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Fellows v. National Can Co. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1926)
Bassey and Selesko, PC v. Condon (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Grant, C. J.

The contract on which this suit is based is sufficiently stated in 119 Mich. 438. This suit is for a second installment of the weekly stipend agreed upon by *166that contract. The defense is the same as in that case, and the further defense was interposed .that the prior suit is a bar to this. It was there held that this was not a. mere contract of service. The case is not, therefore, within the rule stated in Continental Ins. Co. v. Lumber Co., 93 Mich. 139 (32 Am. St. Rep. 494), and authorities there cited. The contract provides for the payment of $20 weekly until it is terminated in the manner therein provided. Defendants cannot disregard one part of the contract, and have the benefit of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.