Watson v. Alberts
Watson v. Alberts
120 Mich. 508; 79 N.W. 1048; 1899 Mich. LEXIS 978
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co. (Ga. 1932)
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit, Flint & Saginaw Railway (Mich. 1909)
- Wood Hydraulic Hoist & Body Co. v. Norton (Mich. 1934)
- Triumph Electric Co. v. Patterson (8th Cir. 1914)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). The property was sold to be attached to the distillery, and plaintiffs so understood it. It was so attached, and was sold by Minnick, as a part of the realty, to defendants, who were bona fide purchasers. The case is ruled by Wickes Bros. v. Hill, 115 Mich. 333.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.