Michigan Supreme Court, 1899

Dages v. Sanilac Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided December 21, 1899

122 Mich. 490; 81 N.W. 355; 1899 Mich. LEXIS 731

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit Judge (Mich. 1904)
Kirby v. Soule (Mich. 1914)
Olds Motor Works v. Wayne Circuit Judge (Mich. 1911)
Mikkola v. Houghton Circuit Judge (Mich. 1911)
Hartz v. Wayne Circuit Judge (Mich. 1910)
Hartz v. Judge (Mich. 1910)
City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit Judge (Mich. 1906)
Taylor v. Ottawa Circuit Judge (Mich. 1955)
First National Tire & Reliner Co. v. Johnson (Mich. 1921)
Geddis v. Wayne Circuit Judge (Mich. 1908)
Valley City Desk Co. v. Kent Circuit Judge (Mich. 1905)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate an order quashing a writ of replevin with costs. The order was a final one, and reviewable on error. The papers on which the order was based were matters of record. Jewell v. Lamoreaux, 30 Mich. 155; Pingree v. Steere, 68 Mich. 204. The case is unlike People v. Bay Circuit Judge, 41 Mich. 326. In that case the application was to vacate an order *491quashing an attachment. The writ contained the usual summons clause, which defendant was still bound to answer, and the case was not dismissed. The order was not, therefore, final. In the present case the order was final, and reviewable on error. See Olson v. Muskegon Circuit Judge, 49 Mich. 85; Orth v. Montcalm Circuit Judge, McGrath, Mand. Cas. No. 717.

The writ will be denied on this ground.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.