Schroder v. Pinch
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- McKnight v. Lowitz (Mich. 1917)
- Scott v. Kona Development Co. (Haw. 1913)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). Two defenses; are interposed:
1. That the account sued upon was not a partnership debt-
2. That plaintiff cannot maintain the action, because he was not a party to the agreement between Pinch and Robinson when the partnership was dissolved.
We think there is testimony tending to show that it was a partnership account. That was the only question submitted to the jury, and they have settled it in favor of the plaintiff.
Defendant was liable as a member of the firm, and no-doubt could arise as to plaintiff’s right to recover as against the members of the firm. The declaration in
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.