Gray v. Eldred

Michigan Supreme Court
Gray v. Eldred, 144 Mich. 23 (Mich. 1906)
107 N.W. 719; 1906 Mich. LEXIS 991
Grant, Hooker, McAlvay, Montgomery, Moore

Gray v. Eldred

Opinion of the Court

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). No such practice is known to the courts of this State. When defendants in a chancery suit have answered, and in their answer have inserted the usual demurrer clause, and replications have been filed, the case must go to a hearing upon the issues joined and a final decree rendered. It is neither proper nor good practice to permit parties to then take advantage of a demurrer and bring the case into this court by piecemeal. The result would be two trials, and possibly two appeals to this court to determine the issues, and great delay. We cannot sanction such a practice, even at the request of the parties litigant.

Without determining the questions raised, the order of the court will be set aside, and the case remanded for hearing upon proofs, should the parties desire to introduce any. No costs will be allowed.

McAlvay, Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
GRAY v. ELDRED
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published