Tiedemann v. Kroll
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Finger v. Weedman (S.D. 1929)
- Gordon v. Township of Burleigh (Mich. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). It appears conceded that as to lot 532 the title to which was in Charlea Kroll, the decree is correct, as it was his homestead. Complainant knew at the time of the sale that the title to lot 533 was not in defendant Charles Kroll. The record title at that time was in the defendant Stanton Farm Company, Limited. It was clearly the duty of complainant to proceed within a year after the sale. Daniel v. Palmer, 124 Mich. 335; Kunze v. Solomon, 126 Mich. 290, and authorities there cited.
Decree is affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.