Aitken v. Chippewa Circuit Judge
Aitken v. Chippewa Circuit Judge
146 Mich. 129; 109 N.W. 223; 1906 Mich. LEXIS 872
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lapham v. Oakland Circuit Judge (Mich. 1912)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The practice pursued in the circuit did not conform to Chancery Rule 7. The relator is also in fault in failing to move for the vacation of the order setting aside default. The proper practice on defendant’s part would have been to move for extension of time, under Chancery Rule 6. As there is still time to proceed anew under Chancery Rule 7, the defendant can preserve his rights.
This application is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.