Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
224 Mich. 98; 194 N.W. 413; 1923 Mich. LEXIS 884
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Benmark v. Steffen (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
- Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Mich. 1940)
- Terzian v. Gordon (Mich. 1924)
- Terzian v. Gordon (Mich. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge granted, unconditionally, defendants’ motion for a new trial. Plaintiff seeks review on writ of error.
The unconditional granting of a motion for a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of error. See Decker v. Fair, 222 Mich. 507; Carton v. Day, 157 Mich. 43; 3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 13736, 12635, and cases cited in the annotations.
The writ is dismissed, with costs to defendants.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.