Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Michigan Supreme Court, 1923

Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart

Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided July 19, 1923 · Bird, Clark, McDonald, Moore, Sharpe, Steere, Wiest
224 Mich. 98; 194 N.W. 413; 1923 Mich. LEXIS 884

Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart

Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.

The trial judge granted, unconditionally, defendants’ motion for a new trial. Plaintiff seeks review on writ of error.

The unconditional granting of a motion for a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of error. See Decker v. Fair, 222 Mich. 507; Carton v. Day, 157 Mich. 43; 3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 13736, 12635, and cases cited in the annotations.

The writ is dismissed, with costs to defendants.

Wiest, C. J., and Fellows, McDonald, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑