Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
Michigan Supreme Court
Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98 (Mich. 1923)
194 N.W. 413; 1923 Mich. LEXIS 884
Bird, Clark, McDonald, Moore, Sharpe, Steere, Wiest
Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge granted, unconditionally, defendants’ motion for a new trial. Plaintiff seeks review on writ of error.
The unconditional granting of a motion for a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of error. See Decker v. Fair, 222 Mich. 507; Carton v. Day, 157 Mich. 43; 3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 13736, 12635, and cases cited in the annotations.
The writ is dismissed, with costs to defendants.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THE MIFFLINBURG BANK v. BICKHART
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published