Sherman v. Sherman
Michigan Supreme Court
Sherman v. Sherman, 232 Mich. 657 (Mich. 1925)
Bird, Clark, McDonald, Moore, Sharpe, Steere, Wiest
Sherman v. Sherman
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $700 and had judgment in a trial without a jury. Defendants bring error. The record shows no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed. There is nothing we can review. It was held in Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569, quoting syllabus:
“In an action tried before the court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SHERMAN v. SHERMAN
- Status
- Published