People v. Anderson
People v. Anderson
209 N.W. 64; 235 Mich. 336; 1926 Mich. LEXIS 705
(North Western Reporter)
People v. Anderson
Opinion of the Court
Defendant's exceptions challenge his conviction of having possessed intoxicating liquor unlawfully on the ground that no case of possession, in fact, was made against him. The point was not raised during the trial by motion, request, or otherwise. It is attempted after verdict by motion to set aside verdict and to arrest judgment. It may not be so raised.Tishhouse v. Schoenberg,
Affirmed, and remanded for judgment.
BIRD, C.J., and SHARPE, SNOW, STEERE, FELLOWS, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred. *Page 337
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.