Sadlowski v. Meeron
Sadlowski v. Meeron
220 N.W. 680; 243 Mich. 602; 1927 Mich. LEXIS 505
(North Western Reporter)
Sadlowski v. Meeron
Opinion of the Court
I have again read the record with care and examined the authorities relied on by counsel. It will serve no useful purpose to restate what was said in the former opinion. I still adhere to the views therein expressed.
The judgment should be affirmed.
FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, McDONALD, and POTTER, JJ., concurred with SHARPE, J. *Page 603
Dissenting Opinion
Reargument and reconsideration confirms the views expressed in my opinion reported in
The judgment should be reversed without a new trial.
FELLOWS and CLARK, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.