Michigan Supreme Court, 1927

Sadlowski v. Meeron

Sadlowski v. Meeron
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided October 3, 1927 · Clark, Fead, McDonald, North, Potter, Sharpe, Wiest, Wlest
243 Mich. 602

Sadlowski v. Meeron

Opinion of the Court

(On Rehearing.)

Sharpe, J.

On defendants’ motion a rehearing was granted in this case. It has again been orally argued by counsel.

I have again read the record with care and examined the authorities relied on by counsel. It will serve no useful purpose to restate what was said in the former opinion. I still adhere to the views therein expressed.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Fead, C. J., and North, McDonald, and Potter, JJ., concurred with Sharpe, J.

Dissenting Opinion

WlEST, J.

(dissenting). Reargument and reconsideration confirms the views expressed in my opinion reported in 240 Mich. 306.

The judgment should be reversed without a new trial.

Fellows and Clark, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.