Sadlowski v. Meeron
Michigan Supreme Court
Sadlowski v. Meeron, 243 Mich. 602 (Mich. 1927)
Clark, Fead, McDonald, North, Potter, Sharpe, Wiest, Wlest
Sadlowski v. Meeron
Opinion of the Court
(On Rehearing.)
On defendants’ motion a rehearing was granted in this case. It has again been orally argued by counsel.
I have again read the record with care and examined the authorities relied on by counsel. It will serve no useful purpose to restate what was said in the former opinion. I still adhere to the views therein expressed.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting). Reargument and reconsideration confirms the views expressed in my opinion reported in 240 Mich. 306.
The judgment should be reversed without a new trial.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SADLOWSKI v. MEERON
- Status
- Published