Quail v. Cole
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ordon v. Sarko (Mich. 1963)
- American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Grier (Mich. 1961)
- Cook v. Wolverine Stockyards Co. (Mich. 1955)
- DOWNRIVER LOAN CO. v. Gabbert (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
- Hensey v. Hensey (Mich. 1951)
- In re Weins' Estate (Mich. 1940)
- Smith v. Weins (Mich. 1940)
- Kirn v. Ioor (Mich. 1934)
- In re Consolidated Freight Co. (Mich. 1933)
- Western Michigan Transportation Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission (Mich. 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal, prosecuted as of right, by plaintiff, from an order setting aside a default and judgment.
The record shows that application by plaintiff for leave to appeal was denied by this court. Review, if any, is by mandamus and not by appeal. *Page 643
Counsel invokes the statute, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 15491, and Court Rules Nos. 55 and 60 (1931). The statute relates to final judgments, and plaintiff has no judgment, but seeks direction, by this court, to have his judgment reinstated. The mentioned rules, while requiring mandamus to be termed an appeal, do not change the law that it is an original writ, and that it does not issue without application and allowance.
Leave to prosecute an appeal in the nature of mandamus was necessary and was not obtained. We, therefore, sua sponte, dismiss the appeal.
Defendant, not having filed a brief at the time this opinion was written, will not recover costs.
CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.