Michigan Supreme Court, 1932

Sieder v. Jerome

Sieder v. Jerome
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided April 4, 1932 · Docket No. 37 · Butzel, Clark, Fead, McDonald, North, Potter, Sharpe, Wiest
258 Mich. 249
Sieder v. Jerome

Opinion of the Court

Fead, J.

In this action on a promissory note, as the testimony shows that the indorser, Jerome, was given notice of dishonor, as required by statute (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9338), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed, with costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.