Bankers Trust Co. v. Humber
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Morris v. Wolfe (Mich. Ct. App. 1973)
- United States v. Nathanson (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1945)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hart (6th Cir. 1935)
- Arrand v. Graham (Mich. 1941)
- Gessner v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1935)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
From dismissal of judgment creditor's bill plaintiff has appealed.
The facts will be implied from statement of the question which is: May a creditor of the husband alone have right by appropriate process to seize rents and income of entireties property? The answer is "No," on the authority of AmericanState Trust Co. v. Rosenthal,
The facts do not make a case where the husband has placed funds or property in an entireties estate in fraud of his creditors, so Morse v. Roach,
Affirmed, with costs.
McDONALD, C.J., and POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. *Page 73
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.