People v. Shaunding
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Karasek (Mich. Ct. App. 1975)
- State v. Marley (Haw. 1973)
- State v. Noe (Ariz. 1963)
- Morissette v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1952)
- United States v. One 1941 Chrysler Brougham Sedan (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1947)
- State v. Goldsberry (Kan. 1945)
- United States v. Rowan (United States Court of Military Appeals 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The trial court was in error in excluding testimony offered by the respondent as to his belief that he had the right to take the property in question from the place from which it was taken.
"The felonious intent is an essential and inseparable ingredient in every larceny, and if a person takes property under a claim of right, however unfounded, he has not committed larceny." People v. Hillhouse,
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial is granted.
NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and POTTER, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, BUTZEL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 220
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.