Michigan Supreme Court, 1940

Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.

Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided October 7, 1940 · NORTH, J.
293 N.W. 892; 294 Mich. 639; 1940 Mich. LEXIS 802 (North Western Reporter)

Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.

Opinion of the Court

This suit arose out of the same accident as Perch v. RailroadCo., ante, 227. The controlling facts and applicable law are the same in the two cases. In the Perch Case on rehearing a majority of the court held that under the record the defendant was entitled as a matter of law to judgment in its favor. Accordingly judgment for defendant by direction of the trial judge in the instant case must be affirmed. Costs to appellee.

BUSHNELL, C.J., and SHARPE, BOYLES, CHANDLER, McALLISTER, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. *Page 640

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.