Shirk v. VAN DYK
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Kimble (Mich. 2004)
- CENT. CEILING & PARTITION, INC. v. Department of Commerce (Mich. 2005)
- Central Ceiling & Partition, Inc. v. Department of Commerce (Mich. 2004)
- In re Request for Advisory Opinion (Mich. 2003)
- People v. Witherspoon (Mich. Ct. App. 2003)
- Central Ceiling & Partition, Inc. v. Dept. of Commerce (Mich. 2003)
- People v. McLaughlin (Mich. Ct. App. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Robert SHIRK and Mary Lee Shirk, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants and Appellees,
v.
Arnold VAN DYK, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 26, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:
I dissent from the denial order. I would peremptorily reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the Barry Circuit Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.