People v. Cron
People v. Cron
679 N.W.2d 41; 470 Mich. 863
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Cron
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Matthew Alan CRON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2003 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. See People v. Perks (On Remand), 259 Mich.App. 100, 672 N.W.2d 902 (2003), lv. den. 469 Mich. 1022 (2004).
CORRIGAN, C.J., dissents and states as follows:
I respectfully dissent from the order denying leave to appeal. I adhere to the views expressed in my previous concurring statement in People v. Perks, 469 Mich. 864 (2003).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.