In re AB
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Samantha Bates v. Township of Van Buren (6th Cir. 2006)
- Jackson v. Miniard (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2023)
- People of Michigan v. Armondo Jackson (Mich. Ct. App. 2019)
- Ludwig v. TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2010)
- Al Akins v. Millicent Warren (6th Cir. 2010)
- Thomas Ross v. Mary Berghuis, Warden (6th Cir. 2005)
- Bronco's Entertainment, Ltd. v. Charter Township Of Van Buren (6th Cir. 2005)
- Bronco's Entertainment, Ltd. v. Charter Township of Van Buren (6th Cir. 2005)
- Bates v. Van Buren Township (6th Cir. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In re A.B., D.B., and M.H., Minors.
Family Independence Agency, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Jenell Rene Turnipseed, Respondent-Appellant, and
Noah Delvern Borden, Aganoris Leontrace Brown, and Wali Husain, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant respondent's application for leave to appeal to consider the following issues: (1) whether the trial court had the authority to terminate respondent's parental rights due in part to the perceived inadequacy of her current living arrangementsa one-bedroom apartment shared with four children; (2) whether the trial court had the authority to terminate respondent's parental rights due in part to her perceived inability to maintain a stable employment or a stable residence; (3) whether respondent, who herself had requested help with her children from the Family Independence Agency after the family's house was destroyed by fire, is being treated in conformity with the law by now having her parental rights terminated; and (4) whether, under the totality of circumstances, the trial court abused its discretion in terminating respondent's parental rights where she had made at least some progress in fulfilling the terms of her parent-agency agreement and had engaged in other efforts to be reunited with her children.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., join the statement of MARKMAN, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.