Michigan Supreme Court, 2005

Dively v. William Beaumont Hosp.

Dively v. William Beaumont Hosp.
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 26, 2005
696 N.W.2d 709; 472 Mich. 906 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Dively v. William Beaumont Hosp.

Opinion

696 N.W.2d 709 (2005)

DIVELY
v.
WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSP.

No. 127218.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 26, 2005.

SC: 127218, COA: 242288.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. Pursuant to MCR 7.316(A)(4), we DIRECT the Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision in light of the transcript establishing that Lighthall was in fact not among the witnesses identified during voir dire. We further DIRECT that the Court of Appeals reconsider the admissibility of Lighthall's testimony under MRE 702 in light of our decisions in Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 470 Mich. 749, 685 N.W.2d 391 (2004), and Craig v. Oakwood Hospital, 471 Mich. 67, 684 N.W.2d 296 (2004).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.