Newman Equities v. CHARTER TP. OF MERIDIAN
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Grievance Administrator v. Reid (Mich. 2005)
- People v. Nero (Mich. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
NEWMAN EQUITIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF MERIDIAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals opinion but AFFIRM the result on alternative grounds. Contrary to the view expressed *112 by the Court of Appeals majority, the court may not consider whether there is a "legitimate difference of opinion" regarding the reasonableness of two zoning schemes. Instead, the court must determine that the zoning approved by the referendum is unreasonable. See, e.g., Kropf v. Sterling Heights, 391 Mich. 139, 156-157, 215 N.W.2d 179 (1974).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.