Hamel v. Rao
Hamel v. Rao
725 N.W.2d 26; 477 Mich. 976
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hamel v. Rao
Opinion
Kevin HAMEL and Kathleen Hamel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Sudhir B. RAO, M.D., and Big Rapids Orthopaedics, P.C., Defendants-Appellants, and
Mecosta County General Hospital, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.