Bennett v. OFFICEMAX, INC.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Dotson (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
William E. BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICEMAX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. Costs of $250 are assessed against the plaintiff in favor of the defendant under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal. The plaintiff is barred from submitting additional filings in this Court until he offers proof that he has paid all his outstanding court-imposed sanctions.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.
WEAVER, J., would issue the order without the last sentence.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.