Brassell v. Laban
Brassell v. Laban
722 N.W.2d 893; 477 Mich. 924
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Brassell v. Laban
Opinion
Troy Orlando BRASSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,
v.
Officer Darrin LABAN, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and
City of Taylor and Officer Ted Michowski, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., would reverse for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals partial dissenting opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.