Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided October 31, 2006

722 N.W.2d 838; 477 Mich. 914 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

722 N.W.2d 838 (2006)

Mark ROZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RETRIEVAL METHODS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Giebel, and John Kravetz, Defendants-Appellees, and
Retrieval Methods, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stanley Ray, Defendants.

Docket No. 131544. COA No. 259217.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.

Opinion

Mark ROZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RETRIEVAL METHODS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Giebel, and John Kravetz, Defendants-Appellees, andRetrieval Methods, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stanley Ray, Defendants.

Mark ROZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RETRIEVAL METHODS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Giebel, and John Kravetz, Defendants-Appellees, and
Retrieval Methods, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stanley Ray, Defendants.