Gillespie v. RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. WARTLEY (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
James GILLESPIE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and Randal J. Armstrong, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants' application for leave to appeal grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair presentation of the issues to the court.
We retain jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.