Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Wright v. Claus

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided August 29, 2006

720 N.W.2d 304; 476 Mich. 868 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

720 N.W.2d 304 (2006)

Philip L. WRIGHT, Pamela G. Wright, and Carl E. Welmers, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Timothy H. CLAUS, James G. Nihems, Jr., and Pro-Med Delivery, Inc., Defendants, and
Send Delivery, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 131253. COA No. 258762.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

August 29, 2006.

*305 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Wright v. Claus

Opinion

Philip L. WRIGHT, Pamela G. Wright, and Carl E. Welmers, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Timothy H. CLAUS, James G. Nihems, Jr., and Pro-Med Delivery, Inc., Defendants, andSend Delivery, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Philip L. WRIGHT, Pamela G. Wright, and Carl E. Welmers, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Timothy H. CLAUS, James G. Nihems, Jr., and Pro-Med Delivery, Inc., Defendants, and
Send Delivery, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.