Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd
Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd
718 N.W.2d 349; 476 Mich. 858; 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1503
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd
Opinion
Roger L. SCHIEFLER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.