Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
Fata v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
717 N.W.2d 877; 476 Mich. 859
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Maples (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Steven FATA, Anna Fata, Dennis Reilly and Rosemary Reilly, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
ROSCOMMON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Lyon Township, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.