Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Baker v. Abramson

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided June 26, 2006

715 N.W.2d 898; 475 Mich. 888 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

715 N.W.2d 898 (2006)475 Mich. 888

Gerry BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Juanita F. Baker, Plaintiff,
v.
Daniel M. ABRAMSON, Arlene O. Peplinski, John Peplinski, Continuum of Clio, Inc., d/b/a Maple Woods Manor, and JFB Investments, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130668. COA No. 262272.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 26, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Baker v. Abramson

Opinion

Gerry BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, andJuanita F. Baker, Plaintiff,v.Daniel M. ABRAMSON, Arlene O. Peplinski, John Peplinski, Continuum of Clio, Inc., d/b/a Maple Woods Manor, and JFB Investments, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.

Gerry BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Juanita F. Baker, Plaintiff,
v.
Daniel M. ABRAMSON, Arlene O. Peplinski, John Peplinski, Continuum of Clio, Inc., d/b/a Maple Woods Manor, and JFB Investments, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.