Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation
Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation
715 N.W.2d 894; 475 Mich. 889
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Rachmaninoff v. Svm Development Corporation
Opinion
Nikolai RACHMANINOFF and Keiko Rachmaninoff, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SVM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Michael T. Zambricki, Christine S. Zambricki, John J. Davey, Mary L. Davey, Ghouse M. Syed, Shazia A. Syed, Asiruddin Ahmad, Jane Ahmad, Marjorie A. Satterlund, Victor M. Kuffler, and Ann E. Kuffler, Defendants-Appellees, and
Richard O. Dye and Norma E. Dye, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.