Haddad v. TSOUKALAS
Haddad v. TSOUKALAS
715 N.W.2d 23; 475 Mich. 872
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Pruett v. Flagstar Bank (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Mark HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
George TSOUKALAS, Defendant-Appellant, and
Alexander Harlambos Sakellaris and Alexandra Sakellaris, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.