Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Diamond v. Witherspoon

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 5, 2006

716 N.W.2d 551; 2006 WL 1196460 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

716 N.W.2d 551 (2006)

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129092. COA No. 252657.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 5, 2006.

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Diamond v. Witherspoon

Opinion

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, andCity of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.