People v. Pittman
People v. Pittman
716 N.W.2d 557; 474 Mich. 1146
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Pittman
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Arnold PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.