Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Hassett v. Archdiocese of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 4, 2006 · Cavanagh

712 N.W.2d 729; 474 Mich. 1134; 2006 WL 1174106 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 729 (2006)474 Mich. 1134

Timothy HASSETT, John Doe, William Johnson, a/k/a "Golf Shoes" Johnson, and John Fruciano, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130159. COA No. 261483.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 4, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Hassett v. Archdiocese of Detroit

Opinion

Timothy HASSETT, John Doe, William Johnson, a/k/a "Golf Shoes" Johnson, and John Fruciano, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

Timothy HASSETT, John Doe, William Johnson, a/k/a "Golf Shoes" Johnson, and John Fruciano, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.