Rowland v. WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners (Mich. 2021)
- Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners (Mich. 2021)
- Estate of Brendon Pearce v. Eaton County Road Commission (Mich. 2021)
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road Commission (Mich. 2007)
- Koutz v. Farm Bureau Insurance (Mich. 2006)
- Leech v. Kramer (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Joanne ROWLAND, a/k/a Joan Rowland, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues addressed: (1) whether appellant's proposed overruling of Hobbs v. Michigan State Highway Dep't, 398 Mich. 90, 96, 247 N.W.2d 754 (1976), and Brown v. Manistee Co. Rd. Comm., 452 Mich. 354, 356-357, 550 N.W.2d 215 (1996), is justified under the standard for applying stare decisis discussed in Robinson v. City of Detroit, 462 Mich. 439, 463-468, 613 N.W.2d 307 (2000); and (2) if so, whether a decision overruling Hobbs and Brown should have retroactive or prospective application under the standard discussed in Pohutski v. City of Allen Park, 465 Mich. 675, 695-699, 641 N.W.2d 219 (2002).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.