Gee v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gee v. ARTHUR B. MYR INDUSTRIES, INC. (Mich. 2008)
- Estate of Dale v. Robinson (Mich. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Waylon E. GEE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR B. MYR INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of whether the current claim for attendant care benefits under MCL 418.315(1) is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.