Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N
Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N
711 N.W.2d 81; 474 Mich. 1099
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N
Opinion
F. Timberlane HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BANK ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Homecomings Financial, Hess Hess & Hess, Trott & Trott, TCIF, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.